Notification of Conviction
Relates to any person (individual or body corporate) who is convicted or whose employee or agentis convicted. Enforcement Agency Name: City of Stirling Date of conviction: 19 June 2025 Name of food business: Brighton Bakery Name of person/s convicted:
Mr Van Vuong Dong, Ms Thi Thuy Dinh and Thinh Vuong Pty Ltd
Address of food business where offence was committed:
111 Brighton Road, Scarborough WA 6019
Date of offence:
1 July 2024, 22 July 2024, 23 July 2024, 24 July 2024 and 21 August
Section of Act/Subsidiary Legislation
Details of offence
Penalty imposed
Food Act 2008 Section 17(handling and sale of unsafe food)
Food Act 2008 Section 68(contravention of prohibition order)
Food Act 2008 Section 22
(compliance with the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code)
Handled food intended for sale in a manner that will render or is likely to render the food unsafe.
Contravened or failed to comply with a prohibition order served on the person under this Division.
Non-compliance with Standard 3.2.2
8 December 2022
•Clause 6 – failed when storing food, to store the food in such a way that it is protected from the likelihood of contamination and the environmental conditions under which it is stored to not adversely affect the safety and suitability of the food.
Van Vuong Dong
$3,600
Thi Thuy Dinh $3,600
Thinh Vuong Pty Ltd
$28,000
Van Vuong Dong
$3,200
Thi Thuy Dinh $3,200
Thinh Vuong Pty Ltd
$12,000
Van Vuong Dong
$18,000
Thi Thuy Dinh $18,000
Thinh Vuong Pty Ltd
$60,000
•Clause 8 – failed, when displaying potentially hazardous food, to display it under temperature control.
•Clause 11 – failed to ensure that food for disposal was held and kept separate until it was destroyed or otherwise used or disposed of so that it cannot be used for human consumption.
•Clause 19 – failed to maintain the food premises to a standard of cleanliness where there is no accumulation of food waste, dirt, grease or other visible matter.
•Clause 21 – failed to maintain the premises, fixtures, fitting and equipment in a good state of repair and working order having regard to their use.
•Clause 24 – failed to take all practicable measures to prevent pests entering the food premises.
Non-compliance with Standard 3.2.2A
•Clause 10 – failed to ensure that each food handler who engages in a prescribed activity has, before engaging in that activity, completed a food safety training course.
•Clause 11 – failed to appoint a food safety supervisor before engaging in a prescribed activity and ensure that the food safety supervisor is reasonably available to advise and supervise each food handler engaged in that prescribed activity.
•Clause 12 – failed to make a record that substantiates any matter that the prescribed provisions require in relation to that prescribed activity and to keep those records for three months after the business makes the record.
health.wa.gov.au
This document can be made available in alternative formats on request for a person with a disability.
© Department of Health 2025
Copyright to this material is vested in the State of Western Australia unless otherwise indicated. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced or re-used for any purposes whatsoever without written permission of the State of Western Australia. Global legal costs in
respect to all penalties
$7257.25